What Is 1926 Ole Miss Rebels football team
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 14, 2026
Key Facts
- The 1926 Ole Miss Rebels football team had a 3–4–1 overall record
- Homer Hazel was in his first season as head coach in 1926
- The team played as an independent with no conference affiliation
- Ole Miss scored 90 total points while allowing 114 points in 1926
- Their home games were played at Vaught–Hemingway Stadium in Oxford, Mississippi
Overview
The 1926 Ole Miss Rebels football team represented the University of Mississippi during the 1926 college football season. Competing as an independent, the team was led by first-year head coach Homer Hazel, who took over the program amid a transitional period for Southern football.
This season marked one of the early chapters in what would become a long football tradition at Ole Miss. Despite a losing record, the 1926 campaign laid groundwork for future development under Hazel’s leadership, who would go on to coach through 1935.
- Season record: The team finished with a 3–4–1 overall record, reflecting a challenging schedule and inconsistent performance across eight games.
- Head coach: Homer Hazel began his tenure in 1926, becoming the 13th head coach in program history and serving until 1935.
- Scoring output: Ole Miss tallied 90 total points during the season, averaging 11.25 points per game, which ranked modestly among Southern teams.
- Defensive struggles: The Rebels allowed 114 points, averaging 14.25 points per game against, highlighting defensive inconsistencies.
- Home venue: Games were played at the original configuration of Vaught–Hemingway Stadium in Oxford, MS, which opened in 1915.
Season Performance
The 1926 season featured a mix of regional opponents, typical of independent programs in the era before widespread conference alignment. Games were scheduled primarily against Southern schools, reflecting geographic and competitive norms of the time.
- September 25: Ole Miss opened the season with a 13–0 win over Mississippi College, setting a positive tone early.
- October 2: The Rebels lost 7–0 to Tulane, a strong independent team that finished 6–2–1 that year.
- October 9: A 19–0 victory over Southwestern Presbyterian demonstrated offensive capability against weaker opposition.
- October 23: A 20–7 loss to Vanderbilt revealed gaps against top-tier Southern teams, as Vanderbilt finished 8–2.
- November 6: A 14–14 tie with Birmingham–Southern was one of two non-decisive results on the schedule.
- November 25: The season concluded with a 20–7 loss to Mississippi State in the annual Egg Bowl rivalry game.
Comparison at a Glance
Comparing the 1926 Ole Miss Rebels to peer programs highlights their mid-tier standing in Southern football:
| Team | Record (W-L-T) | Points For | Points Against | Head Coach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ole Miss | 3–4–1 | 90 | 114 | Homer Hazel |
| Vanderbilt | 8–2 | 187 | 41 | Dan McGugin |
| Tulane | 6–2–1 | 137 | 47 | Bierman |
| Mississippi State | 4–5 | 80 | 77 | Charles Poindexter |
| Alabama | 7–2–1 | 170 | 41 | Wallace Wade |
The table illustrates that while Ole Miss was competitive, they trailed stronger programs like Vanderbilt and Alabama in both win-loss record and scoring margin. Their point differential of –24 reflected a team that struggled defensively but showed flashes of offensive potential. The tie with Birmingham–Southern and narrow losses suggested room for improvement under Hazel’s leadership.
Why It Matters
The 1926 season is a footnote in Ole Miss football history but provides insight into the program’s early development. As the first year under Hazel, it marked the beginning of a decade-long coaching era that helped stabilize the team.
- Foundation for growth: The 1926 season initiated Homer Hazel’s 10-year tenure, the longest at the time, providing much-needed continuity.
- Rivalry continuity: The annual Egg Bowl against Mississippi State continued, reinforcing regional football traditions.
- Independent scheduling: Without a conference, Ole Miss had flexibility in scheduling but lacked the structure of league play.
- Player development: Early 20th-century teams like this one relied on local talent, with limited national recruitment.
- Historical context: College football in 1926 predated the NCAA tournament and modern rankings, relying on regional reputations.
- Legacy value: Records from this era contribute to Ole Miss’s official all-time win-loss statistics and historical archives.
Though not a standout year, 1926 remains part of the foundation upon which the Ole Miss football program built its identity in the decades to come.
More What Is in Sports
Also in Sports
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.