What Is 1928 The Citadel Bulldogs football
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 14, 2026
Key Facts
- The 1928 The Citadel Bulldogs finished the season with a 3–6 overall record
- Jock McKinnon was the head coach during the 1928 season
- The team played its home games at Johnson Hagood Stadium
- They competed as an independent, not affiliated with a conference
- Their season included losses to strong regional opponents like South Carolina and Clemson
Overview
The 1928 The Citadel Bulldogs football team represented The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina, during the 1928 college football season. Competing as an independent, the team was led by head coach Jock McKinnon, who was in his third year at the helm.
The Bulldogs compiled a 3–6 overall record, struggling against regional rivals and failing to secure a winning season. Despite the challenges, the team continued to build tradition at Johnson Hagood Stadium in Charleston, where they played their home games.
- Record: The team finished the 1928 season with a 3–6 overall win-loss record, reflecting a difficult campaign against regional competition.
- Coach: Jock McKinnon served as head coach, leading the program from 1926 to 1929 before stepping down after four seasons.
- Home Stadium: All home games were played at Johnson Hagood Stadium, which has been the team’s home field since 1927.
- Season Start: The Bulldogs opened the 1928 season on September 29 with a loss to Newberry College, setting the tone for a tough year.
- Independent Status: The Citadel competed as an independent, meaning they were not part of any formal athletic conference during the 1928 season.
Season Performance
The 1928 campaign featured a mix of regional opponents, with The Citadel facing schools from South Carolina and surrounding states. The schedule tested the team’s depth and resilience, resulting in more losses than wins.
- September Games: The Bulldogs lost to Newberry and Furman early, winning only against smaller opponent Wofford in mid-season.
- October Challenges: They faced tough defeats against South Carolina (0–20) and Clemson (0–21), highlighting the gap with stronger programs.
- Defensive Struggles: The team was shut out in three games, failing to score against South Carolina, Clemson, and Davidson.
- Victories: Wins came against Wofford, Lenoir–Rhyne, and Brevard, all smaller or less-established programs at the time.
- Scoring: The Bulldogs scored just 40 total points across nine games, averaging less than 4.5 points per game.
- Season End: Their final game was a 13–0 loss to Oglethorpe on November 24, closing out a disappointing season.
Comparison at a Glance
How the 1928 season compares to surrounding years in The Citadel football history:
| Season | Record | Head Coach | Home Stadium | Notable Opponents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1926 | 3–5–1 | Jock McKinnon | Johnson Hagood | South Carolina, Furman |
| 1927 | 4–5 | Jock McKinnon | Johnson Hagood | Clemson, Davidson |
| 1928 | 3–6 | Jock McKinnon | Johnson Hagood | South Carolina, Clemson, Furman |
| 1929 | 2–7 | Jock McKinnon | Johnson Hagood | Clemson, Wofford |
| 1930 | 5–4 | Carl Prause | Johnson Hagood | Davidson, Furman |
The 1928 season was consistent with the program’s performance in the late 1920s—struggling to achieve a winning record but maintaining a consistent schedule against regional teams. While not a standout year, it contributed to the foundation of The Citadel’s long-standing football tradition.
Why It Matters
Though the 1928 season was unremarkable in terms of wins, it remains a part of The Citadel’s athletic history and reflects the challenges of early 20th-century college football programs at smaller military schools. These seasons helped shape the identity of the Bulldogs program.
- Historical Context: The 1928 season occurred during the early development of college football as a national sport.
- Military Tradition: The Citadel emphasized discipline and physical training, which influenced team performance and culture.
- Independent Status: Without conference affiliation, scheduling was inconsistent, affecting team preparation and competitiveness.
- Player Development: Many athletes balanced rigorous military training with sports, limiting practice time and depth.
- Legacy: Seasons like 1928 are preserved in school records, contributing to The Citadel’s 100+ years of football history.
- Evolution: The struggles of the 1920s contrast with later success, such as the 1992 Southern Conference championship.
Understanding seasons like 1928 helps contextualize the growth of college football at institutions like The Citadel, where athletics and military education have long been intertwined.
More What Is in Sports
Also in Sports
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.