What Is 1933 Cincinnati Reds baseball team
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 14, 2026
Key Facts
- The 1933 Cincinnati Reds had a win-loss record of 64-88 (.421 winning percentage)
- They finished 7th in the National League, 32.5 games behind the first-place New York Giants
- Manager Bob O'Farrell led the team for the entire season before being replaced in 1934
- Home games were played at Crosley Field, located in Cincinnati, Ohio
- The team averaged 7,182 fans per home game during the 1933 season
Overview
The 1933 Cincinnati Reds were a Major League Baseball team competing in the National League during the Great Depression era. Despite a challenging economic climate, the franchise continued operations at Crosley Field, striving for competitiveness amid financial constraints and inconsistent performance.
Under the leadership of player-manager Bob O'Farrell, the Reds struggled to find consistency on the mound and at the plate. The season reflected broader trends of the early 1930s, where teams balanced cost-cutting with efforts to maintain fan engagement through affordable entertainment.
- Record: The team finished with a 64-88 win-loss record, resulting in a .421 winning percentage, one of the worst in the league.
- League Standing: They placed seventh in the eight-team National League, finishing 32.5 games behind the first-place New York Giants.
- Manager: Bob O'Farrell served as player-manager for the full season, marking his second and final year in the role.
- Ballpark: All home games were held at Crosley Field, a downtown Cincinnati stadium known for its compact outfield dimensions.
- Attendance: The Reds drew an average of 7,182 fans per game, totaling approximately 323,000 for the season across 81 home dates.
Performance & Season Highlights
The 1933 campaign was marked by offensive inconsistency and underperforming pitching, despite flashes of individual talent. The Reds showed moments of promise but lacked the depth to sustain winning streaks over a grueling 152-game schedule.
- Runs Scored: The Reds tallied 593 runs, averaging 3.9 runs per game, ranking seventh in the National League.
- Runs Allowed: They gave up 718 runs, the second-worst total in the league, highlighting defensive and pitching deficiencies.
- Starting Rotation: Paul Derringer led the staff with 12 wins, while Tom Zachary added 11 despite a 4.79 ERA.
- Key Hitter: Ival Goodman led the team with a .297 batting average and 42 RBIs, emerging as a reliable offensive presence.
- Power Hitting: The team hit only 38 home runs all season, with Riggs Stephenson and Lew Riggs combining for 14.
- Fielding: The Reds committed 162 errors, with a collective fielding percentage of .958, below the league average.
Comparison at a Glance
The 1933 Reds compared poorly to both division leaders and mid-tier teams in the National League. The table below highlights key statistical differences between Cincinnati and top-performing clubs.
| Team | W-L Record | Win % | Runs Scored | Runs Allowed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cincinnati Reds | 64-88 | .421 | 593 | 718 |
| New York Giants | 91-61 | .599 | 709 | 570 |
| St. Louis Cardinals | 77-77 | .500 | 681 | 642 |
| Chicago Cubs | 82-71 | .536 | 658 | 606 |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 80-74 | .519 | 659 | 627 |
The data reveals a significant gap between the Reds and top teams like the Giants, who outperformed Cincinnati in nearly every category. While the Reds scored fewer runs and allowed more, their run differential of -125 was the second-worst in the league, underscoring systemic issues.
Why It Matters
Though not a championship contender, the 1933 season provides insight into the challenges faced by smaller-market teams during baseball’s pre-integration era. It reflects the transition period before the Reds’ eventual resurgence in the late 1930s.
- The season highlighted the need for improved player development and scouting investments.
- Low attendance and financial strain influenced front-office decisions in subsequent years.
- Managerial changes after 1933 signaled a shift toward more specialized leadership roles.
- The team’s struggles contributed to long-term roster overhauls in the mid-1930s.
- It marked the final full season before the Reds began investing in farm system development.
- Historical context places the 1933 team as part of a rebuilding phase preceding future competitiveness.
Understanding this season helps illustrate the evolution of the franchise and the broader economic and competitive dynamics of 1930s baseball.
More What Is in Daily Life
Also in Daily Life
- Difference between bunny and rabbit
- Is it safe to be in a room with an ionizer
- Difference between data and information
- Difference between equality and equity
- Difference between emperor and king
- Difference between git fetch and git pull
- How To Save Money
- Does "I'm 20 out" mean youre 20 minutes away from where you left, or youre 20 minutes away from your destination
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.