What Is 1960 small college football rankings

Overview

The 1960 small college football rankings reflected the performance of teams competing outside the NCAA's University Division, later known as Division I. These rankings were primarily compiled by the Associated Press (AP) and highlighted dominant programs from smaller institutions across the United States.

Unlike major college football, small college teams operated with limited budgets and regional schedules, yet still drew passionate local followings. The final 1960 AP poll featured only 10 teams, emphasizing the selectivity of recognition during that era.

• North Dakota State finished the season ranked No. 1 after an undefeated 9–0 record, becoming the consensus small college champion.
• The AP released rankings weekly during the season, with the final poll published in December 1960.
• Delaware State rose as high as No. 5 during the season, showcasing strong mid-season performance.
• Only teams from NCAA College Division (now Division II and III) were eligible for inclusion in the small college rankings.
• Rankings were based on voting from a panel of sportswriters and broadcasters across the U.S.

How It Works

The 1960 small college football rankings operated through a combination of expert voting, win-loss records, and strength of schedule assessments. Unlike today’s computer-aided systems, the process relied heavily on subjective evaluations by journalists.

• AP Poll: The Associated Press conducted a national survey of sportswriters who submitted ballots ranking the top 10 small college teams each week.
• Final Poll: Released in December 1960, it determined the official national small college champion based on season-long performance.
• Eligibility: Teams had to compete in the NCAA College Division and not be part of the major college (University Division) ranks.
• Undefeated Seasons: North Dakota State’s perfect 9–0 record was a key factor in their No. 1 ranking.
• Regional Bias: Eastern and Midwestern teams received more media coverage, influencing voter perception and rankings.
• Television Exposure: Limited national broadcasts meant rankings relied more on print journalism and local reporting.

Comparison at a Glance

Below is a comparison of the top five teams in the final 1960 small college football rankings:

The table highlights how win-loss records and conference strength influenced final rankings. North Dakota State’s undefeated season gave them a decisive edge, while Delaware State and Carson-Newman’s single losses prevented a unanimous selection. Regional diversity was evident, with teams from the Midwest, South, and East represented.

Why It Matters

The 1960 small college football rankings were pivotal in shaping the identity of non-major college football programs and laid groundwork for future divisions within the NCAA. Recognition in the rankings often led to increased enrollment, funding, and alumni support.

• National Exposure: Being ranked boosted visibility for small schools, helping them attract athletes and fans.
• Recruiting Edge: Top-ranked teams like North Dakota State gained a competitive advantage in recruiting high school talent.
• Historical Legacy: The 1960 rankings are cited in NCAA records as a benchmark for small college excellence.
• Divisional Evolution: These rankings contributed to the formal split between NCAA divisions in 1973.
• Media Influence: The AP poll demonstrated the growing power of sports journalism in shaping public perception.
• Championship Recognition: No official playoff existed, so the final poll served as the de facto national championship.

Today, the 1960 season is remembered as a turning point when small college football began gaining broader recognition, setting precedents for future rankings and postseason structures.