What Is 2004 James Madison Dukes football
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Key Facts
- The 2004 James Madison Dukes finished with a 6–5 overall record
- Head coach Mickey Matthews led the team during his fifth season
- The Dukes played in the Atlantic 10 Conference, finishing 4–4 in conference play
- They did not qualify for the NCAA Division I-AA playoffs
- Home games were played at City Stadium in Harrisonburg, Virginia
Overview
The 2004 James Madison Dukes football team represented James Madison University during the 2004 NCAA Division I-AA football season. Competing in the Atlantic 10 Conference, the team was led by head coach Mickey Matthews, who was in his fifth year at the helm.
The Dukes showed moderate improvement compared to previous seasons, posting a winning record overall but falling short of a playoff berth. Their season included a mix of strong offensive performances and defensive inconsistencies that ultimately kept them out of postseason contention.
- Record: The team finished with a 6–5 overall record, including a 4–4 mark in Atlantic 10 Conference play, reflecting a competitive but inconsistent season.
- Head Coach: Mickey Matthews, in his fifth season, continued to build the program’s foundation, emphasizing defense and disciplined play-calling throughout the 2004 campaign.
- Home Stadium: The Dukes played their home games at City Stadium in Harrisonburg, Virginia, a venue with a capacity of approximately 25,000 spectators.
- Conference: As members of the Atlantic 10 Conference for football, JMU competed against teams like Richmond, Delaware, and Villanova in conference matchups.
- Playoff Eligibility: Despite a winning record, the Dukes did not qualify for the 16-team NCAA Division I-AA playoffs, which required a conference title or at-large bid.
Season Performance Breakdown
The 2004 season featured a balanced schedule of non-conference and conference opponents, with the Dukes aiming to improve on their 7–4 record from 2003. While they showed flashes of offensive potential, consistency remained an issue across the 11-game slate.
- Season Opener: JMU opened with a 24–21 win over Division II member Winston-Salem State, setting a positive tone for the early part of the season.
- Key Win: A 27–24 victory over in-state rival Richmond in October gave the Dukes a significant boost and highlighted their competitive edge.
- Offensive Output: The team averaged 23.6 points per game, with quarterback Justin Thorpe leading the passing attack with over 1,800 yards on the season.
- Defensive Struggles: The defense allowed 22.4 points per game, with notable lapses in close losses to Delaware and Massachusetts contributing to their playoff miss.
- Road Challenges: The Dukes went 2–4 on the road, struggling to maintain momentum in away conference games despite strong home support.
- Season Finale: They closed the season with a 31–17 win over VMI, finishing above .500 for the first time since 2001 and setting the stage for future success.
Comparison at a Glance
The 2004 season can be better understood by comparing it to surrounding years in the program’s history, particularly in terms of records, coaching stability, and playoff outcomes.
| Season | Overall Record | Conference Record | Playoff Result | Head Coach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 5–6 | 4–4 | Did not qualify | Mickey Matthews |
| 2003 | 7–4 | 5–3 | Did not qualify | Mickey Matthews |
| 2004 | 6–5 | 4–4 | Did not qualify | Mickey Matthews |
| 2005 | 7–4 | 6–2 | Did not qualify | Mickey Matthews |
| 2006 | 5–6 | 4–4 | Did not qualify | Mickey Matthews |
This table illustrates that the 2004 season was part of a transitional period for JMU football, with steady but unspectacular results. While not a breakout year, it contributed to the foundation that would eventually lead to national prominence in later years, including a national championship in 2004 at the FCS level in 2016.
Why It Matters
The 2004 season, while not historically dominant, played a crucial role in the long-term development of James Madison’s football program. It demonstrated incremental progress under consistent leadership and helped recruit talent that would later achieve greater success.
- Program Growth: The 6–5 record in 2004 reflected steady improvement, reinforcing JMU as a competitive force in the Atlantic 10 and FCS football.
- Recruiting Momentum: Success on the field helped attract higher-caliber recruits, especially in Virginia and the Mid-Atlantic region.
- Coaching Stability: Mickey Matthews’ continued leadership provided continuity, which was vital for long-term strategic planning and player development.
- Foundation for Success: The experience gained in close losses and key wins laid the groundwork for deeper playoff runs later in the decade.
- Fan Engagement: Competitive seasons like 2004 helped grow attendance and local support, strengthening the program’s community ties.
- Transition Era: This season marked a bridge between early FCS competitiveness and the national championship aspirations JMU would later achieve.
Though not a headline-making year, the 2004 James Madison Dukes football season was a building block in the program’s rise to FCS prominence, setting the stage for future achievements.
More What Is in Sports
Also in Sports
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.