What Is 2006 Brown University football team
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Key Facts
- The 2006 Brown Bears football team had a 4–6 overall record
- They finished 3–4 in Ivy League competition
- Head coach Phil Estes led the team for the 9th season
- Home games were played at Brown Stadium in Providence, RI
- The team scored 177 points, averaging 17.7 per game
Overview
The 2006 Brown University football team competed in the NCAA Division I-AA (now FCS) as a member of the Ivy League. Led by head coach Phil Estes, it was his ninth season at the helm, and the team played its home games at Brown Stadium in Providence, Rhode Island. Despite strong individual performances, the Bears struggled to maintain consistency across the season.
The team finished with a 4–6 overall record and a 3–4 mark in Ivy League play, placing them in the middle of the conference standings. They faced a challenging non-conference schedule and had difficulty closing out close games. Nevertheless, the season provided valuable development for younger players and laid groundwork for future competitiveness.
- Overall record: The 2006 Brown Bears finished with a 4–6 win-loss record, reflecting a slight decline from the previous season’s 5–5 mark.
- Conference performance: In Ivy League play, they went 3–4, failing to secure a top-half finish in the seven-team standings.
- Head coach: Phil Estes, in his ninth year, continued to build the program with an emphasis on academic-athletic balance.
- Scoring output: The team averaged 17.7 points per game, totaling 177 points across 10 games.
- Defensive challenges: Brown allowed 22.3 points per game, indicating struggles in containing opposing offenses.
How It Works
The 2006 season followed standard NCAA Division I-AA rules and Ivy League scheduling formats, with a ten-game season composed of non-conference and conference matchups. Each game followed standard college football regulations, including 12-minute quarters and standard scoring rules.
- Division I-AA: The NCAA’s second-highest football tier, now known as FCS, where Brown competed. Teams in this division have smaller athletic budgets and no athletic scholarships.
- Ivy League: An eight-member conference with no athletic scholarships; emphasis is placed on academic excellence and competitive balance.
- Season length: The Bears played 10 regular-season games, typical for Ivy League teams, which do not participate in postseason playoffs.
- Roster size: Brown carried approximately 85 players on its roster, adhering to NCAA roster limits for non-scholarship programs.
- Game structure: Each game consisted of four 15-minute quarters, with overtime used if needed under NCAA rules.
- Coaching staff: Phil Estes led a staff of 12 assistants, overseeing offense, defense, and special teams units.
Comparison at a Glance
Below is a comparison of the 2006 Brown Bears with other Ivy League teams and national FCS averages:
| Team | Overall Record | Conference Record | Points Scored | Points Allowed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown | 4–6 | 3–4 | 177 | 223 |
| Yale | 5–5 | 4–3 | 198 | 212 |
| Columbia | 3–7 | 2–5 | 162 | 245 |
| Harvard | 7–3 | 5–2 | 245 | 189 |
| Princeton | 5–5 | 4–3 | 210 | 205 |
The data shows Brown was competitive but lacked the offensive firepower of top teams like Harvard. Their point differential of –46 placed them below the Ivy median. While they outperformed Columbia, they fell short of Yale and Princeton in head-to-head matchups. The team’s performance reflected the challenges of maintaining consistency in a physically demanding league without athletic scholarships.
Why It Matters
The 2006 season is a snapshot of Brown’s football program during a transitional era, balancing academic rigor with athletic ambition. Though not a championship contender, the team contributed to long-term program development and player growth.
- Player development: Several underclassmen gained starting experience, including future team captains like Mark DeRosa.
- Recruiting impact: Competitive games helped attract academically strong athletes interested in Ivy League football.
- Conference parity: The close scores highlighted the Ivy League’s competitive balance despite no postseason.
- Coaching continuity: Phil Estes’ long tenure provided stability rare in college football.
- Historical context: This season preceded Brown’s stronger 2008 campaign, showing incremental progress.
- Academic model: The team exemplified the Ivy League’s commitment to student-athlete success beyond sports.
The 2006 Brown Bears may not have made headlines nationally, but they played a vital role in sustaining a tradition of excellence both on the field and in the classroom.
More What Is in Education
Also in Education
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.