What Is 2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Key Facts
- Over 1,134 workers died in the collapse on April 24, 2013
- More than 2,500 people were injured in the disaster
- The building housed five garment factories supplying global brands
- Cracks were seen the day before, but workers were forced to return
- The collapse sparked global reforms in garment industry safety standards
Overview
The Rana Plaza disaster was a catastrophic structural failure that occurred in the Dhaka suburb of Savar, Bangladesh. It exposed deep flaws in industrial safety regulations and supply chain oversight within the global garment industry.
The eight-story Rana Plaza complex housed multiple garment factories producing clothing for major international retailers. Despite visible structural cracks, workers were ordered back to work the following day, leading to the deadly collapse.
- April 24, 2013: The Rana Plaza building collapsed at approximately 8:57 a.m., trapping over 3,000 workers beneath rubble and debris.
- 1,134 confirmed deaths: This makes it the deadliest garment factory accident in modern history, surpassing previous tragedies like the Triangle Shirtwaist fire.
- Over 2,500 injured: Survivors suffered severe injuries, including fractures, crush syndrome, and long-term disabilities requiring extensive medical care.
- Five garment factories: The building housed factories such as Phantom Flex, New Wave Style, and Everest Garment, producing for brands like Walmart, Joe Fresh, and Primark.
- Warning signs ignored: Cracks appeared in the building on April 23, and a nearby garment factory refused to operate, but Rana Plaza managers forced employees to return.
Causes and Structural Failures
The collapse stemmed from a combination of illegal construction, corruption, and disregard for worker safety. Investigations revealed multiple engineering and regulatory failures that contributed to the disaster.
- Unapproved upper floors: The building was originally designed for commercial use with only six floors, but two additional floors were added illegally without structural reinforcement.
- Heavy machinery on upper floors: Generators and industrial equipment were installed on the top floors, increasing load stress beyond safe limits.
- Substandard concrete and rebar: Construction materials were of poor quality, with concrete strength tests showing less than half the required standard.
- Corruption in permits: Local officials approved construction despite safety violations, and building inspectors failed to act on known risks.
- Generator use during power outage: On the morning of the collapse, a power outage led to the activation of heavy backup generators, possibly contributing to vibrations.
- Owner's criminal negligence: Sohel Rana, the building owner, was later convicted of murder and sentenced to prison for ignoring safety warnings.
Comparison at a Glance
Comparing the Rana Plaza collapse with other industrial disasters highlights its scale and impact on labor reforms.
| Event | Year | h>Death Toll | Location | Industry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rana Plaza collapse | 2013 | 1,134 | Dhaka, Bangladesh | Garment manufacturing |
| Triangle Shirtwaist fire | 1911 | 146 | New York City, USA | Clothing factory |
| Bhopal gas tragedy | 1984 | 3,000–16,000 | Bhopal, India | Chemical manufacturing |
| Upper Big Branch mine disaster | 2010 | 29 | West Virginia, USA | Coal mining |
| Didion Milling explosion | 2017 | 5 | Wisconsin, USA | Food processing |
While the Bhopal disaster resulted in more fatalities, Rana Plaza had the highest death toll in garment industry history. It became a global symbol of unsafe working conditions in developing countries and spurred international action.
Why It Matters
The Rana Plaza collapse was a turning point for labor rights and corporate accountability in global supply chains. It forced brands, governments, and NGOs to confront systemic issues in garment production.
- Accord on Fire and Building Safety: A legally binding agreement signed by over 200 brands to inspect and fund safety upgrades in Bangladeshi factories.
- Increased factory inspections: More than 38,000 inspections were conducted, leading to the closure or repair of hundreds of unsafe facilities.
- Compensation fund: A $30 million fund was established to compensate victims and families, though distribution faced delays and disputes.
- Global activism: Campaigns by labor unions and NGOs pressured brands like H&M and Benetton to accept responsibility and contribute to relief efforts.
- Legal reforms in Bangladesh: The government strengthened labor laws, allowing easier unionization and improving building safety codes.
- Shift in consumer awareness: Shoppers became more conscious of fast fashion ethics, driving demand for transparency in clothing production.
The tragedy underscored the human cost of low-cost apparel and led to lasting changes in how global companies manage their supply chains. While challenges remain, Rana Plaza remains a pivotal moment in the fight for worker safety.
More What Is in Daily Life
Also in Daily Life
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.