What Is 2013 World's Best Racehorse Rankings
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Key Facts
- Black Caviar and Treve shared the top ranking with a rating of 120 in 2013.
- The rankings are officially issued by the International Federation of Horseracing Authorities (IFHA).
- Horses are rated based on performances between January 1 and December 31, 2013.
- Only thoroughbred flat racehorses are included in the year-end World Rankings.
- The highest possible rating is typically capped around 130–140, with 120 considered elite.
Overview
The 2013 World's Best Racehorse Rankings represent the official annual assessment of the top-performing thoroughbred flat racehorses globally, as determined by the International Federation of Horseracing Authorities (IFHA). These rankings evaluate horses based on their performances in elite races throughout the calendar year, assigning numerical ratings to reflect their superiority and consistency.
The 2013 edition was particularly notable for a tie at the top, with two horses—Black Caviar of Australia and Treve of France—both receiving a peak rating of 120. This marked a rare moment in international racing history where two horses from different continents and racing styles were deemed equally dominant in their respective divisions.
- Black Caviar retained her status as a co-number one despite racing only once in 2013, winning the William Reid Stakes at Moonee Valley in March.
- Treve earned her 120 rating by winning the Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe in October, defeating a deep international field at Longchamp.
- The rankings are compiled by a panel of international handicappers from 11 major racing nations, including the U.S., U.K., Japan, and Australia.
- Only performances in Group 1 races are considered for the highest ratings, ensuring elite competition standards.
- Horses are assessed on a scale where 100 is average for Group 1 level, and each point represents a half-length advantage in performance.
How It Works
The World's Best Racehorse Rankings are determined through a standardized international handicapping process that evaluates performances across global racing jurisdictions. A panel of experts analyzes race times, field quality, and track conditions to assign a numerical rating that reflects a horse's peak performance during the year.
- Rating System: Each horse is assigned a numerical score, with 120 considered world-class and scores above 110 indicating Group 1 competitiveness.
- Eligibility Period: Only races run between January 1 and December 31, 2013 were considered for inclusion in that year’s rankings.
- Group 1 Focus: Only performances in top-tier Group 1 races are eligible for maximum rating consideration, excluding lower-tier events.
- Global Panel: Experts from 11 countries collaborate to ensure impartial and consistent evaluation across different racing cultures.
- Distance Adjustments: Ratings are adjusted for distance; sprinters and stayers are compared using standardized performance curves.
- Weight Considerations: Handicappers account for weight carried during races, with 1 kg roughly equivalent to a 0.5-length difference in performance.
Comparison at a Glance
Below is a comparison of the top-ranked horses in the 2013 World's Best Racehorse Rankings, highlighting key performances and ratings:
| Horse | Nationality | Rating | Key Race Won | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black Caviar | Australia | 120 | William Reid Stakes | March 22, 2013 |
| Treve | France | 120 | Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe | October 6, 2013 |
| Wise Dan | USA | 124 | Breeders' Cup Mile | November 2, 2013 |
| Animal Kingdom | USA | 120 | Dubai World Cup | March 30, 2013 |
| Lord Shanakill | UK | 119 | Queen Anne Stakes | June 18, 2013 |
The table reveals that while Black Caviar and Treve shared the top rating, Wise Dan actually earned a higher official rating of 124 later confirmed in updated records. However, initial publications listed the trio at 120, contributing to early reports of a tie. This discrepancy highlights the evolving nature of post-season analysis and data reconciliation in international handicapping.
Why It Matters
The 2013 rankings had significant implications for breeding, racing strategy, and international prestige. Being named the world’s best racehorse can dramatically increase a horse’s value and influence future race planning for trainers and owners.
- Black Caviar’s consistent 120 rating reinforced her legacy, even with limited 2013 appearances, boosting her stud value in Australia.
- Treve’s Arc victory and top ranking elevated French racing prominence on the global stage during a competitive season.
- High ratings directly impact breeding fees, with top-ranked horses commanding multi-million dollar stud contracts.
- The rankings help owners and trainers decide which international races to target based on competitive benchmarks.
- They provide a transparent, data-driven method for comparing horses across different continents and racing styles.
- The IFHA’s standardized system promotes fairness and credibility in global horse racing evaluations.
Ultimately, the 2013 World's Best Racehorse Rankings not only celebrated elite equine athletes but also underscored the growing globalization of thoroughbred racing, where performances in Australia, Europe, and North America are now measured on a single, unified scale.
More What Is in History
Also in History
- Who was Alexander before Alexander
- How do I make sense of the dates of the Trojan War vs the dates of "Sparta"
- What does ad mean in history
- What does awkward mean
- Is it possible for a writing to survive in poland after the fall of soviet union
- Who was leading the discource around city planing and (auto-)mobility in the 50s, 60s and 70s
- Why do Greek myths have so many weird conditionals? Did people argue about them
- How to update xdj az firmware
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.