What Is 2014 Harvard Crimson football team
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Key Facts
- 7-3 overall record in the 2014 season
- 6-1 Ivy League record, second place in conference standings
- Head coach Tim Murphy in his 20th season at Harvard
- Home games played at Harvard Stadium in Boston, Massachusetts
- Lost to Dartmouth in the final game, costing them a share of the Ivy title
Overview
The 2014 Harvard Crimson football team competed as part of the NCAA Division I Football Championship Subdivision (FCS), representing Harvard University in the Ivy League. Under the leadership of head coach Tim Murphy, who was in his 20th season, the team had a strong showing, finishing with a 7-3 overall record and a 6-1 conference record.
Despite their impressive performance, the Crimson narrowly missed securing a share of the Ivy League title after a critical loss in the final game of the season. The team demonstrated consistency throughout the year, with standout performances on both offense and defense.
- 7-3 overall record: The Crimson won seven of their ten games, with losses only to strong opponents like Dartmouth and Princeton.
- 6-1 Ivy League record: Harvard finished second in the conference, just behind Dartmouth, who claimed the title with an 8-1 record.
- Final game defeat: A 31-27 loss to Dartmouth in November ended Harvard’s hopes of a shared Ivy championship.
- Harvard Stadium: All home games were played at the historic 30,323-seat stadium located in Boston, Massachusetts, built in 1903.
- Coach Tim Murphy: In his 20th year leading the program, Murphy continued to build a competitive team with strong academic-athletic balance.
Season Performance Breakdown
The 2014 season was marked by resilience and high-level execution across multiple facets of play. Harvard’s offense and defense showed marked improvement compared to previous years, especially in conference matchups.
- Offensive output: Averaged 33.1 points per game, ranking among the top in the Ivy League and showcasing balanced scoring.
- Defensive strength: Allowed only 19.8 points per game, one of the lowest averages in the conference, highlighting disciplined play.
- Key victory: Defeated Yale 34-21 in The Game, preserving a winning streak against their historic rival.
- Rushing attack: Accumulated 1,876 rushing yards on the season, led by running back Paul Kirk.
- Passing game: Quarterback Colton Chapple threw for 1,982 yards and 14 touchdowns before being replaced mid-season.
- Turnover margin: Maintained a positive turnover differential of +5, crucial in close conference games.
Comparison at a Glance
Harvard’s 2014 season can be better understood by comparing it to key Ivy League competitors:
| Team | Overall Record | Ivy Record | Points For | Points Against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard | 7-3 | 6-1 | 331 | 198 |
| Dartmouth | 7-3 | 7-0 | 328 | 172 |
| Yale | 5-5 | 4-3 | 258 | 229 |
| Princeton | 3-7 | 2-5 | 205 | 268 |
| Columbia | 3-7 | 2-5 | 192 | 265 |
The table illustrates that while Harvard and Dartmouth had identical overall records, Dartmouth’s undefeated Ivy performance secured them the title. Harvard’s strong defense and scoring margin reflected a team capable of championship contention, but the final loss proved decisive. The Crimson outscored opponents by 133 points, second only to Dartmouth’s 156-point differential.
Why It Matters
The 2014 season underscored Harvard’s continued competitiveness in the Ivy League and highlighted the fine margins that determine conference success. Though they fell short of a title, the team’s performance reinforced the program’s reputation for excellence.
- Academic-athletic balance: Harvard continued to prove elite football can coexist with rigorous academic standards.
- Rivalry success: The victory over Yale preserved a 3-2 record in The Game over the previous five years.
- Player development: Several players earned All-Ivy honors, showcasing the program’s talent pipeline.
- Recruiting impact: Strong seasons like 2014 help attract top-tier student-athletes to the program.
- Historical context: This season was part of a decade of consistent success under Tim Murphy’s leadership.
- National relevance: While not FCS playoff-eligible due to Ivy League rules, Harvard remained a nationally recognized program.
The 2014 Harvard Crimson football team exemplified the high level of play expected from one of college football’s most storied programs, laying groundwork for future success despite falling just short of a championship.
More What Is in Sports
Also in Sports
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.